Monday 2 March 2015

SERMON SECOND SUNDAY OF LENT – YEAR B “THE FORK IN THE ROAD” MARK 8:31-36 / MARCH 1, 2015

sermon
second sunday of lent – year b
“the fork in the road”
mark 8:31-36  /  march 1, 2015
Let us pray: May the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of our hearts be acceptable to you, O God, our strength and our redeemer.  Amen.

Yogi Berra, legendary baseball player, once quipped, “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.”  
Here, early on in our journey through the season of Lent, we come to a fork in the road.   Here, in the eighth chapter of Mark’s gospel, the story of Jesus breaks in half.    This is where the story ends.   This is where the story begins.  It all depends.   It all depends where you are going and which direction you are traveling and who you are following.    Jesus and his disciples are traveling through the villages of Caesarea Philippi. 
The landscape doesn’t look particularly imposing, but if you drop a ball in the first part of the eighth chapter it bounces back to Galilee where the story of Jesus began with his ministry of healing, preaching, confronting and ousting  evil, calming storms, feeding multitudes.    If you drop a ball in this, the latter part of the eighth chapter, it rolls all the way to Jerusalem, it rolls all the way to the foot of the cross.

The disciples have come to a fork in the road and they want to take it.  They want to follow Jesus; they have been following Jesus.   Later Peter will blurt out,
“We have left everything and followed you!”    They want to follow Jesus but when they hear him talking about suffering and death their hearts sink within them; suffering, rejection, death, who would choose that direction?    No one would.   They want to follow Jesus and they don’t want to follow Jesus.   They have come to the fork in the road and they want to take it. 

This fork in the road is where many would part company with him, but Peter doesn’t want to part ways.  
He doesn’t want to take the fork in the road that leads away from Jesus; Peter only wants supportively to improve on Jesus’ plan.  Peter wants to chart a course for Jesus that avoids suffering, rejection, and death.  It’s a helpful suggestion.   I mean what are friends for?    Jesus’ best friends and followers understand this.   They remove the cross from their sanctuaries because the symbolism of the cross is so unpleasant, so off-putting, so negative.  They want a symbol more positive,
A worship more buoyant, a faith more attractive.  
What Jesus is selling here in Ceasarea Phillipi just won’t sell.   Peter knows that.  Many churches see things the same way.   
This passage  in the eighth chapter of Mark points us to the contrast between what has been called the ‘theology of glory’ and the ‘theology of the cross’.  
The theology of glory is built on what appears to be self-evident about life and on assumptions about the way one would expect God to act in the world.  
The theology of the cross, however, is grounded in God’s self-revelation in the weakness of suffering and death.      We can imagine the scene.  Peter walks over to Jesus, puts his arm around him, takes him aside to set him straight about messiahship.  We might imagine Peer saying to Jesus, “suffering, rejection, and death are not on the agenda.  Prestige, power, and dominion are the agenda.    It’s David’s throne we’re after, ruling the nations with power and might.   We signed on for a crown, not a cross!”    Jesus hears peter out.  Then, turning and looking at all of the disciples, he rebukes Peter  and what a rebuke it is!   Peters comments are, for Jesus, evil, even satanic.  Peter’s words remind Jesus of his own personal temptations, and of the  forces beyond him that set out to change his course, to turn him away from the cross to another kind of messiah.   The truth about who God is often contradicts what persons expect God to be.  He truth is God’s mercy is given to sinners, not reserved for the righteous; God’s strength is exposed in weakness, not displayed in power;
God’s wisdom is veiled in parable and paradox, not set out in self-help maxims; God’s life is disclosed in death.  Thus it is that Jesus says those who want to save their life will lose it, while those who lose their life for the sake of the gospel will save it.   God is not conformed to human expectations or desires, for God is found in uncertainty, danger, and suffering  - precisely where human wisdom perceives God’s absence.  
Contemporary theologian Douglas John Hall writes about a theology of the cross that is set over against a North American culture of official optimism, national progress, technological advance, personal fulfillment, and church growth.   Plumbing the depths of such an understanding of God is difficult when dominant expressions of Christianity prize success and effectiveness in corporate life, personal fulfillment, and deliverance from pain.  A theology of the cross declares that faith is not certainty, hope is not mere optimism, and love is not painless.  This may not be a welcome message in many churches who have done away with the cross in their sanctuaries.   Mark’s gospel rules out a faith built on a romanticized portrait of a tolerant Jesus who only helps and heals and welcomes.   Anthony Padovano wrote of Jesus’ suffering this way:  “it was not a love for suffering which Christ reveals, but a love which prevails in suffering.  
It is not the physical death of Jesus which is redemptive, but the love of Jesus for us even unto death.”      
Out of his love of God and love of neighbour Jesus said what he did, lived as he did, and did not deviate from that path even when that path led to Jerusalem and the excruciating death that awaited him.     It’s a denial of ‘self’ as Jesus put it.  

We might expect God to do for us what the world tells us we need:  to be self-seeking, self-enhancing, to be self-concerned, self- actualiziing  - for our own benefit,  our own success,  our own individual betterment and progress.    But this scripture text declares the hard truth that to follow Jesus we are to give up ‘self’.    
As Jesus and his followers prepare to go to Jerusalem, Jesus tells them to give up their lives, in other versions, to leave the ‘self’ behind.  Don’t pack your ‘self’; leave it here in the fork in the road.  leave ‘self’ here because you can’t take it with you; leave ‘self’ behind because it’s too large to pack, too heavy to carry; leave ‘self’ behind because you wouldn’t know what to do with it once you get there.   So, how can we leave our ‘selfs’ behind?   How do we ‘deny ourselves’?   The ‘self’ inside me is me. 
This ‘self’ is what decides for me.  This ‘self’ chooses to go this way or that way.   How do I, how do we, leave this ‘self’ behind?  A Zen master once asked his pupil,”show me this ‘self’ you’re always talking about so much?” 
If we could haul out our ‘self’ as a specific thing or object, we could leave it behind like a forgotten toothbrush or a misplaced key, but our ‘self’ is precisely what we cannot get out of, get loose from, depart from.   How do we do that?  

Well I believe this is a life-long task.   It is a matter of living and growing into the likeness of Christ, a matter of letting go of ‘self’ and taking up – shouldering -- our own cross as Jesus says.    The ‘cross’, by the way is not some personal problem we have, some difficulty or burden in our lives.   Rather, the ‘cross’ is something we bear because we follow Jesus.   Jesus, in his rebuke of  Peter, is saying that he does not promise  that by following him  things will go better for us.  That is the desire of the ‘self’.   Rather, he promises that in following him, we will find our way to God.  

When we follow Jesus we may find ourselves traveling to the Jerusalem’s of our world and our lives – places where there is oppression, corruption, those in power pre-occupied with selfish concerns.    And being in such places and times bringing with us gospel values which we dare to express  in word and action can bring to us suffering and rejection.   Very few of us, thankfully, will ever suffer anything even remotely close to bodily harm or death for the sake of our faith?   
One who did – Christian Martyr – Dietrich Bonhoeffer – wrote this in his publication entitled, letters and papers from prison:   “it is only by living completely in this world that one learns to believe.  One must abandon every attempt to make something of oneself.  This  is what I mean....taking life in one’s stride, with all its duties and problems, its successes and failures, its experiences and helplessness.  It is in such life that we throw ourselves utterly in the arms of God and participate in the sufferings in the world and watch with Christ....   that is faith...and that is what makes a person and a Christian.  How can success make us arrogant or failure lead us astray, when we participate in the sufferings of God by living in this world?” 
In this forty days of Lent, we may contemplate not only the wonderful power of the cross of Christ, but the power inherent in taking up our own crosses too.  Opportunities are daily before us, times when we may give our lives sacrificially to acts of love, compassion, justice, and peace, even in the face of the same imperial forces of sin and death that confronted Jesus.




I invite you, in this Lenten season, and in our faith journey beyond, to  travel together.   We take the fork in the road, traveling with divided hearts, clinging to self yet following Jesus, hoping to lose ourselves but fearful of what would be left of us,  -- but we travel together.

“I always love to begin a journey on Sundays,” said the great author, Jonathan Swift.   “I always love to begin a journey on Sundays,” he said, “because I shall have the prayers of the church to preserve all that travel by land, or by water.”  We pray for each other; we do not pray for our ‘selfs,’  but pray that we might leave them behind on the way.   We make our journey following Jesus—enclosed and embraced  -- in our prayers for each other.   Amen.
Major Resources:
“The Art of Losing Our “Selfs”, by Patrick J. Willson in Preaching – Word & Witness, Vol. 03:1 (Year B), pp.75-76.   Paul Scott Wilson, editor.   Liturgical Publications Inc.   New Berlin WI.  2003.

“Theological Perspective” by Joseph D. Small and “Homiletical Perspective” by W. Hulitt Gloer in
Feasting on the Word, Year B, Volume 2, pp.68-73.  David L. Bartlett and Barbara Brown Taylor, Editors.
Westminster John Knox Press.  Louisville, Kentucky.   2008.

“Suggestions For Preaching” in Emphasis – A Preaching Journal for the Parish Pastor, Vol. 26,
Number 5, p.51.CSS Publishing Company, Inc.  Lima, Ohio.  1997.

“Proclaiming the Text” in Pulpit Resource, Vol. 245 No. 1 Year B, pp. 31-32.  Editor:  William H. Willimon.
Wood Lake Books.  Winfield, BC.  1997.



No comments:

Post a Comment